Negotiation Agents that Make Prudent Compromises and are Slightly Flexible in Reaching Consensus
نویسنده
چکیده
The contribution of this work is designing and developing enhanced market-driven agents with the flexibility to (1) respond to changing market conditions, and (2) raise and relax trade aspirations. Previous theoretical analyses have shown that market-driven agents (MDAs) make prudent compromises by reacting to changing market situations by taking into account factors such as competition, deadlines, and trading options. This work augments the design of an MDA with three fuzzy decision controllers that guide the agent in (i) relaxing trade aspiration in face of intense negotiation pressure, and (ii) raising trade aspiration in extremely favorable markets. Results from extensive simulations conducted using an implemented testbed suggest that when compared to MDAs, agents in this work achieved (1) higher success rates in reaching deals, (2) higher average utilities, and (3) higher expected utility.
منابع مشابه
An Approach to a Multi-agent Based Scheduling System Using a Coalition Formation
In this paper, we propose methods for multi-agent scheduling based on a coalition game and two mechanisms called \nemawashi" and \settoku." The \nemawashi" and \settoku" mechanisms facilitate reaching a consensus among agents. We show the e ect of these mechanisms in a practical scheduling system. 1. SCHEDULING SYSTEM In this paper, we propose a multi-agent scheduling system based on the coalit...
متن کاملRational Agents, Contract Curves, and Inefficient Compromises Report
Several studies of two-party negotiations have shown that negotiators more often than not reach inefficient compromises. We analyze the circumstances under which rational agents make inefficient compromises and refrain from improving them. We do this by describing and interpreting various negotiation situations and by developing formal constructs and theorems for determining the character of a ...
متن کاملRational agents, contract curves, and inefficient compromises
Several studies of two-party negotiations have shown that negotiators more often than not reach inefficient compromises. We analyze the circumstances under which rational agents make inefficient compromises and refrain from improving them. We do this by describing and interpreting various negotiation situations and by developing formal constructs and theorems for determining the character of a ...
متن کاملCross-Cultural Time Sensitivity in a Bilateral E-Negotiation System
For a long time, culture has been an influencing parameter in negotiations. Growth of international trades and business competitions has increased the importance of negotiations among countries and different cultures. Developing new technologies, particularly the use of artificial intelligence in electronic trading areas, has provided us with the application of intelligent agents to resolve cha...
متن کاملOutput Consensus Control of Nonlinear Non-minimum Phase Multi-agent Systems Using Output Redefinition Method
This paper concerns the problem of output consensus in nonlinear non-minimum phase systems. The main contribution of the paper is to guarantee achieving consensus in the presence of unstable zero dynamics. To achieve this goal, an output redefinition method is proposed. The new outputs of agents are functions of original outputs and internal states and defined such that the dynamics of agents a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Computational Intelligence
دوره 20 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004